Showing posts with label sp3a. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sp3a. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

Outloook 2002 & SQL Server 2000

Hi ,
I am running SQL server 2000 sp3a and MS Outlook 2002. I have created the
profile and tested it within mail from the ontrol panel which i can received
the email.
From SQL Server , i assigned the profile "Test" to SQL Mail & SQL Mail Agent
and click on the test which said "Successfully started(stopped) a mail
session with this profile".
Then i went ahead to create the operator and put in a valid email addr and i
click on the "test" which gave me a return message that said "the message wa
s
successfully sent" but somehow i did not recieve that email
How can i fix this ?
appreciate ur advice
tks & rdgs
Message posted via webservertalk.com
http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200602/1Hi ,
to add on further i used Query Analyzer and i got the "mail sent" using
xp_sendmail @.recipient = 'eee' , @.subject = 'oooo'
tks & rdgs
maxzsim wrote:
>Hi ,
> I am running SQL server 2000 sp3a and MS Outlook 2002. I have created the
>profile and tested it within mail from the ontrol panel which i can receive
d
>the email.
>From SQL Server , i assigned the profile "Test" to SQL Mail & SQL Mail Agen
t
>and click on the test which said "Successfully started(stopped) a mail
>session with this profile".
>Then i went ahead to create the operator and put in a valid email addr and
i
>click on the "test" which gave me a return message that said "the message w
as
>successfully sent" but somehow i did not recieve that email
>How can i fix this ?
>appreciate ur advice
>tks & rdgs
Message posted via webservertalk.com
http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200602/1|||Hi ,
Upon further checking i see that all those mails were "stucked" in the MS
Outlook.
I'll have to manually click on the "send/receive" to sent out those emails .
furthermore , i can only send to those company email addr and not the
hotmail/gmail address.
i have set up the SMTP server but not the POP3 server i do not intend to
receive any incoming email
How can i prevent the emails from being saved to MS Outlook and i don't have
to manually click on the "send/receive" and how can i send to all valid emai
l
addresses ?
appreciate ur advice
tks & rdgs
maxzsim wrote:
>Hi ,
> to add on further i used Query Analyzer and i got the "mail sent" using
>xp_sendmail @.recipient = 'eee' , @.subject = 'oooo'
>tks & rdgs
>
>
>[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
Message posted via webservertalk.com
http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200602/1|||I am pretty sure you cannot because that is the latest outlook security
feature to prevent software sending out junk emails. Software could be
downloaded and take over your email service to send out emails without you
knowing it.
"maxzsim via webservertalk.com" <u14644@.uwe> wrote in message
news:5c2572e6256ac@.uwe...
> Hi ,
> Upon further checking i see that all those mails were "stucked" in the MS
> Outlook.
> I'll have to manually click on the "send/receive" to sent out those emails
> .
> furthermore , i can only send to those company email addr and not the
> hotmail/gmail address.
> i have set up the SMTP server but not the POP3 server i do not intend to
> receive any incoming email
> How can i prevent the emails from being saved to MS Outlook and i don't
> have
> to manually click on the "send/receive" and how can i send to all valid
> email
> addresses ?
> appreciate ur advice
> tks & rdgs
> maxzsim wrote:
> --
> Message posted via webservertalk.com
> http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200602/1|||Hi ,
I want to configure something with SQL Mail & SQL Agent Mail to auto send
out alert email so what software could help me acheive this ?
tks & rdgs
Grant wrote:
>I am pretty sure you cannot because that is the latest outlook security
>feature to prevent software sending out junk emails. Software could be
>downloaded and take over your email service to send out emails without you
>knowing it.
>
>[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
Message posted via webservertalk.com
http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200602/1|||Hi ,
Actually i am as to why i ccan only send to company123@..xxx.sss
but not xxx@.hotmail/gmail.com as i thought if you could send via SMTP then i
t
shld send as long as its a valid email addr ?
i got this error message " 554 Relay rejected for policy reasons."
appreciate ur advice
tks & rdgs
Grant wrote:
>I am pretty sure you cannot because that is the latest outlook security
>feature to prevent software sending out junk emails. Software could be
>downloaded and take over your email service to send out emails without you
>knowing it.
>
>[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
Message posted via webservertalk.com
http://www.webservertalk.com/Uwe/Forum...amming/200602/1

Outlook needs to be open for SMTP.

sql2k sp3a
Ive been testing using the Pop3/ SMTP option as an alternative to Exchange
for SQL Alerts. I can get everything running with no problems. I set up an
operator and can test it 10 times in a row with success... while Outlook is
opened. But if I close Outlook, I will be able to test with success no more
than 2 times. (Though it does say sent successfull.) I will hit the test
button and the email will never arrive.
I will then log onto the box and attempt to open Outlook and it won't allow
me too. It complains about the Outlook.pst file being in use. The only way
to free this file up is to restart the SQL Agent. Only then does my test
email possibly arrive.
Has anyone else experienced this? Fix?
TIA, ChrisRMaybe one of the articles linked here:
http://www.aspfaq.com/2403
(Or you might consider switching to XP_SMTP_SendMail.)
--
This is my signature. It is a general reminder.
Please post DDL, sample data and desired results.
See http://www.aspfaq.com/5006 for info.
"ChrisR" <noemail@.bla.com> wrote in message
news:OZ7ldn3PFHA.2348@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> sql2k sp3a
> Ive been testing using the Pop3/ SMTP option as an alternative to Exchange
> for SQL Alerts. I can get everything running with no problems. I set up an
> operator and can test it 10 times in a row with success... while Outlook
> is opened. But if I close Outlook, I will be able to test with success no
> more than 2 times. (Though it does say sent successfull.) I will hit the
> test button and the email will never arrive.
> I will then log onto the box and attempt to open Outlook and it won't
> allow me too. It complains about the Outlook.pst file being in use. The
> only way to free this file up is to restart the SQL Agent. Only then does
> my test email possibly arrive.
> Has anyone else experienced this? Fix?
> TIA, ChrisR
>
>|||ChrisR
your not alone, i had the same issue. NEVER found an answer ((HUGS))
"ChrisR" wrote:
> sql2k sp3a
> Ive been testing using the Pop3/ SMTP option as an alternative to Exchange
> for SQL Alerts. I can get everything running with no problems. I set up an
> operator and can test it 10 times in a row with success... while Outlook is
> opened. But if I close Outlook, I will be able to test with success no more
> than 2 times. (Though it does say sent successfull.) I will hit the test
> button and the email will never arrive.
> I will then log onto the box and attempt to open Outlook and it won't allow
> me too. It complains about the Outlook.pst file being in use. The only way
> to free this file up is to restart the SQL Agent. Only then does my test
> email possibly arrive.
> Has anyone else experienced this? Fix?
> TIA, ChrisR
>
>

Friday, March 23, 2012

Out of sync

Hi,
We are using SQl 2000 EE with sp3a and doing transactional replication of
300+gb db.
frequently the subscribers are out of sync .
In order to spped up the replication process we have modfied the polling
interval to '1' and commit batch size to '1000' of distribution db ,Log
reader agent polling interval to 1 and Readbatchsize to 1000.
some times the subscriptions are in sync and sometimes not.
Why the log reader agent is not able to commit more than 100 transactions to
distribution db.Please suggest some thing in order to speed up the
replication process
I have executed sp_replcommands on OLtp it has nearly 75000 transactions to
commit.
Thanks
Murali
How big is your transaction log?
When you start to get big (and I don't mean your waist size) transactional
log maintenance is a must. You should be dumping your log as frequently as
each minute. You must also try to size your transaction log as well.
To do this observer the size of your tlog. Back it up, and shrink it. Then
size it to a best guess of what it should be.
Run dbcc loginfo to get an idea of your virtual log files. After a shrink
you should have 4. You want to run with perhaps 16-64, definitely not
several hundred or thousand. This will be an iterative process, but you
might start at 10 Mg, and work up/down from there.
The reason you want to maintain your transaction log is you want to minimize
the size of the log your log reader agent has to read. Also I would bump up
the read batch size threshold to 200 or more. If you run into problems with
your log reader being unable to chew through the log (the could not execute
sp_replcmds message) you will want to drop the ReadBatchSize and the
ReadBatchSizeThreshold values, but other than that you will want to increase
it.
Also set the HistoryVerboseLevel setting to 0.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Murali" <Murali@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2D4B32EA-2860-4182-B914-FADECC2C9224@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> We are using SQl 2000 EE with sp3a and doing transactional replication of
> 300+gb db.
> frequently the subscribers are out of sync .
> In order to spped up the replication process we have modfied the polling
> interval to '1' and commit batch size to '1000' of distribution db ,Log
> reader agent polling interval to 1 and Readbatchsize to 1000.
> some times the subscriptions are in sync and sometimes not.
> Why the log reader agent is not able to commit more than 100 transactions
to
> distribution db.Please suggest some thing in order to speed up the
> replication process
> I have executed sp_replcommands on OLtp it has nearly 75000 transactions
to
> commit.
> Thanks
> Murali
>
|||oops, make sure HistoryVerboseLevel is 1 for the Log Reader Agent and 0 for
the Distribution Agent.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Murali" <Murali@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2D4B32EA-2860-4182-B914-FADECC2C9224@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> We are using SQl 2000 EE with sp3a and doing transactional replication of
> 300+gb db.
> frequently the subscribers are out of sync .
> In order to spped up the replication process we have modfied the polling
> interval to '1' and commit batch size to '1000' of distribution db ,Log
> reader agent polling interval to 1 and Readbatchsize to 1000.
> some times the subscriptions are in sync and sometimes not.
> Why the log reader agent is not able to commit more than 100 transactions
to
> distribution db.Please suggest some thing in order to speed up the
> replication process
> I have executed sp_replcommands on OLtp it has nearly 75000 transactions
to
> commit.
> Thanks
> Murali
>

Monday, February 20, 2012

os partition problems

Hi,
I recently installed MSSQL 2000 and sp3a onto a windows 2003 server in a test lab. I configured one big c: partion on this os and installed the db in the default location.

I need to detach the db's on this server and re-attach them onto another MSSQL 2000/sp3a server running 2003 os with a partition scheme like this:

c: = 20 gigs for the os
e: = 600 gigs for the data

I could not re-attach the db's onto the e:\default path\to\database

Is there a work-around for this? This makes sense to me as to why it is not working and was an install oversight on my part but there has to be a way to overcome this delima?

Thanks in advance,
damnitYou can change the location of the files.

EXEC sp_attach_db @.dbname = N'pubs',
@.filename1 = N'c:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL\Data\pubs.mdf',
@.filename2 = N'c:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL\Data\pubs_log.ldf'